#Harrison mixbus 32c analog how to
#Harrison mixbus 32c analog full
#Harrison mixbus 32c analog software

#Harrison mixbus 32c analog software

They also make the software that I think is the best for composing, recording, and editing music. I can think of a company that is building their OS on top of open source software and has made a great contribution to the community. These guys are spending a lot of money and resources supporting open source software, which is a cause that I strongly believe in. This was done by a company with a pedigree that knows the best way to mix. The old mixing ITB paradigm was designed by software engineers and not people familiar with mixing. The only interest that I have is in trying to support this great effort made by a company that's new to NLEs.

#Harrison mixbus 32c analog how to

I don't know how to convey that I don't work for Harrison other than to say: trust me. It dawned on me about halfway through typing my post that I would be accused of this. I realize that reps from companies lurk in forums like these just waiting for someone to dis (do the kids still say dis?) their product so they can drop in some official talking points to balance out opinion. Maybe I should try to use some more cool advertising words like: Harrison MixBus' realish analog mixer looking knobs are the delicious and refreshing way to loose weight. I know I should really get into advertising. Yeah, thats the best sales pitch I've EVER HEARD. I don't want your tracks sounding as good as mine. I strongly encourage everyone to give MixBus a try.actually, I take that back. The pedigree behind Record (audio toy manufacturer) is also apparent, in a bad way.

I realize why everyone wants to compare this program to the PropellerHeads proggy, but from my (limited) tests I can tell you that there is no comparison. I believe this will make it the first program to do this without the use of plugins. It also has latency compensation for external effects units.

#Harrison mixbus 32c analog full

Version 1.1 of MixBus, which is still in testing, has full latency compensation throughout. So when you move beyond the built in busses and have to use Ardour's busses you don't get that feature. Ardour (the program that MixBus is built on) doesn't have latency compensation. There is full latency compensation on the Harrison mixer busses. The person who did that test screwed something up. Noone (myself included) has been able to reproduce the NULLing mixes from any app with mixbus. Slamthecrank gave the highlights of the early stages of a thread on GearSlutz (the thread is now at 35 pages and the skeptics are dying off there). Does it sound as good as an analog Harrison console? NO. I don't know about having a real console in the box, but what ever is in there sounds great. You wouldn't believe how much this can speed up a mix.Īs far as the marketing goes, like with all products, you have to separate the language from the fact. This is a far more intuitive approach than having to open EQ and compression in separate windows. I love having the EQ and dynamics easily available in the mixer window. With the two projects that I've moved from logic to mixbus, I was able to get a nicer sounding mix in much less time with fewer plugins. The mixes I've done on it sound much better than I can get out of logic. This is a fantastic sounding piece of software. I read what you guys were saying and thought I would balance the opinions on this thread out a little (so there you go.full transparency). I found this thread doing a quick google search on Harrison Mixbus. Rather than spot checks in mono for issues, I spend a lot of time in mono.Hi guys. I have to add a step now where I listen to the whole thing in mono and ultimately end up bringing the 'loud center aspects' back about 1.5-3db. That's debateable as to whether it should behave that way, but I just had to recall some mixes I printed reverbs from one of the auxes to stereo tracks assigned directly to the master.I had to trim them all +3db to get the same level as they were when they were on the live auxes. #2 is incorrect (for 32c at least), a stereo file panned 'in the middle' will be reduced by 3db.

I'd just wanna be shure to have the same settings in Nuendo when exporting audio stems. pan law should be the same for mixbus and mixbus 32c (-3db)īen, can you confirm this? I did not find any information in the manual. stereo channels are not touched by pan lawģ. for mono channels pan law in mixbus is set to a fixed value of - 3db when pan is centeredĢ.